I realize I have a little bit more to say about the giving and receiving of feedback, and the concept of "Intention/Impact". I refer back both to my blog entry a couple of days ago, and also to a piece I wrote in December about Gary Harper and his book: The Joy of Conflict Resolution. A quick review: in his book, Harper describes three archetypes we tend to play when caught up in the "drama triangle"--
- The Villain
- The Hero
- The Victim
What's significant to me is that each archetype believes that they have GOOD INTENTIONS. There's that word again, "intentions". The villain generally thinks she's helping the world in some way, and that she's just misunderstood. The hero tends to feel that by stopping the villain, he is demonstrating his devotion to the common good. And the victim also feels she has the best of intentions, foiled by the self-serving villain.
So, all three characters believe they have positive intentions. What makes it a "drama" or "conflict" triangle is that the three characters don't share their intentions with each other and try to find mutual solutions. They ACT OUT. The villain tries to find someone to help her slay the villain. The hero asserts himself forcefully for the the victim's benefit. And the villain fights back against the hero, often becoming the victim herself when the hero crosses the line and behaves overly aggressively.
At home or at work (in the office or out on scavenger hunt)... I believe it would behoove us, when involved in a conflict, to stop and ask ourselves these six questions:
1) What role am I playing? Am I acting out the victim, seeking aid to my cause? Am I playing the aggressive hero? Might I be perceived as the misunderstood villain?
2) How am I labeling the other people involved in the drama?
3) What positive intentions might they at least think they have?
4) Can I speak to each person and affirm to them my recognition of their positive intention?
5) Can I then communicate to each person the impact of their actions (no matter how positive the intention)?
6) And finally, can we brainstorm mutually beneficial solutions, where everyone's needs get met?
By acknowledging people's positive intentions, you keep them in the dialogue. The conversation feels safer for them when they know you don't see them as the villain. Sure, their well-intended actions may have backfired, but at least they started from a positive place. And that often makes all the difference.

My wife and I had a fight yesterday morning -- one of those domestic spats that every couple has now and again. It went something like this:
I've ventured into a new team building venture this summer -- leading "ropes courses" (for the
After talking about it for a long time, I finally performed my first-ever teleclass yesterday, on the topic: "Creating Team-Building Treasure Hunts: The Five Deadly Mistakes (and how to avoid them)". 
One of my favorite books at the moment is "How to make Collaboration Work," by David Straus (founder of Interaction Associates). It's all about ways organizations can (and should) allow key stakeholders to take part in the decision making.
Back in 1987, I was in the process of wrapping up a two-year stint in Shimonoseki, Japan as an ESL (English as a Second Language) teacher when my path took me up to the big city-- Tokyo. For the last few months, I'd been in a bit of a dark place--frustrated by my struggles with Japanese culture and my ongoing status as a "gaijin" (foreigner). When I finally sat down to jaw with my buddy, Tim, a jazz musician and old-Japan hand (his father was the American Ambassador to Japan!), I recall the conversation going something like this:
A few nights ago, I'm in my kitchen, standing over the hot stove, pots bubbling and boiling, and it's clear to me that this meal is going very, very wrong.
Whether you're doing an indoor corporate team building event or an outdoor business team building exercise, the question remains the same: What do particpants get out of the experience? My typical answer is:
Have you ever found yourself on the losing side of a battle? The fighting is done; everything you believed in is gone...and the universe now seems like a dark and lonely place, without purpose, without meaning?
Whether I'm doing corporate team building in Atlanta, Boston, Dallas, or Los Angeles, the same question from managers and supervisors comes up repeatedly:
I've been thinking a lot of late about virtual teamwork. When I talk about virtual teamwork, I'm referring to both meetings that are held using conference (and videoconference) calls, and also virtual events convened via conference calls or else via something more visual, like the virtual world, Second Life.
As it's my birthday today, I'm going to take a day off from writing. Wish me a happy one...I'll be back on line Monday.
Following my solemn guide deeper and deeper into Tofukuji's sanctum sanctorum, I remember thinking to myself: "This is incredible! I made it! And in a few minutes, I'm going to meet an actual enlightened person!"
Long before I became a team building consultant and corporate scavenger hunt expert, I was something of an international vagabond. Back in 1986, at age 23, my main focus in life was to see the world and accumulate "experiences".
'm intrigued by this Web 2.0 thing, even if I don't exactly know how to make money from it. Is anyone out there really using Social Networking to make a profit (apart from the so-called Twitter/LinkedIn/Facebook "consultants")?
